Rahm Emanuel Breaks With Democrats On Transgender Issues During Megyn Kelly Interview

Instagram/@megynkelly

The former mayor of Chicago and Rahm Emanuel administration official broke some serious ground this week by publicly dissenting from the Rhodes Democratic party on transgender issues in an eleven-minute interview with Megyn Kelly. The stunner came down when Emanuel muttered straight from the heart that “A man can’t become a woman,” throwing in some doubts about males performing in sports. Instances remain scarce of well-known Democrats going against the grain on such charged cultural topics, and social media exploded with reactions that ranged from cautious hopefulness to deep skepticism.

Advertisement

In Emanuel’s interview, he looked at gender identity issues from a perspective very much at war with most of the Democratic Party, speaking on medical transition for minors and saying it should be families who make the decisions rather than the state. Yet, he is profoundly uncomfortable concerning minors making permanent medical decisions. “These are life decisions and a child can’t make that decision,” he told Kelly, somewhat singling out policies in states like Minnesota, where the courts can basically override any opposition from a child’s parents as to medical transition.

The clip shows Kelly pressing Emanuel on several transgender-related issues, including the question of whether men should be in female prisons and an even more fundamental question of whether sex can be changed. The very direct “no” he gave in response to “can a man become a woman?” starkly contrasted with the more carefully worded statements Democratic politicians typically deliver on the subject. The interview has been promoted heavily by Kelly and her team, with the accompanying caption even highlighting Emanuel’s departure from the common views of his party.

Response poured across social media, revealing some deep divisions even within conservative circles. Reactionaries filled the array of suspicion towards Emanuel’s motives, with one remarking, “He is definitely saying what he knows we want to hear. He’d have completely different answers if mainstream media were asking him.” This was echoed by many skeptics who are asking whether any of the articulated preferences of Emanuel would be a ton easier to uphold in real-world conditions or under pressure from a different interviewer.

Others showed themselves to be squarely fixated on the subject of Emanuel and minors and medical transitions. “Parents shouldn’t be able to transition a child. We, as a society, choose to protect the vulnerable,” said one fiery comment, drawing parallels with other decisions society makes to protect children, such as child labor laws. This sparked a debate on parental rights versus state intervention, with others pointing out that in a few states, schools can aid in transitions without parental consent or knowledge.

The unfolding of Emanuel’s statements did not sit quite well with political watchers. Several offered speculation that the strategy was probably aimed at some future presidential bid, with one stating plainly, “Rahm wants the white house. He might as well just announce it.” The commenter also drew some parallels between Emanuel and some of the recent stances taken by Governor Gavin Newsom of California, who has at times distanced himself from progressive orthodoxy on some issues, albeit only at general liberal levels.

Many attacked the source of prejudice by tying Emanuel back to the Obama era and Chicago “politics.” “Do not trust him! He is part of the Obama/Clinton/Chicago corruption,” warned one user, with others following up with statements like, “I’m never going to believe anything he says, just like Newscum, they will say (lie) anything to get a vote.” That very deep level of distrust towards establishment political figures could almost be felt permeating throughout.

Some of the more intellectually stimulating comments touched on what Emanuel’s stances could mean for the Democratic Party at large. “Wow! I hope people in his party will listen to reason, but that’s highly doubtful!” remarked one commenter, noting just how distant these positions have grown from those commonly voiced by the lead national Democratic party figures. Several others viewed the fact that Emanuel would dare to openly defy such views in an interview with Conservative Media as a possible first sign of changing winds, yet at least as many questioned his sincerity.

Advertisement

The interview and subsequent reactions to Emanuel only serve to muddy one of America’s most contentious fronts—the transgender issue—even further. If Emmanuel is political grandstanding or a sincere evolution of thought that goes against his party’s forward path, he is one of the few prominent Democrats willing to openly challenge the progressive orthodoxy on gender identity issues. It remains to be seen, as the 2024 election cycle starts to heat up, whether more Democrats will rally behind Emanuel or if he is standing alone on this one. What is clear is that these issues are driving a wedge between Americans along party lines, with no easy answers in sight.